HomeNewsIndustrial Rates
Below National Avg
Montana • North Dakota • New MexicoMar 30, 2026

Industrial Electricity Rates 2026: Montana, North Dakota, and New Mexico Benchmarks

The Bottom Line (Industrial Power 2026)

At publication, EIA January 2026 industrial benchmarks showed Montana at 5.97¢/kWh, North Dakota at 7.84¢/kWh, and New Mexico at 7.12¢/kWh, versus a national industrial average of 8.88¢/kWh. Current-status update: EIA February 2026 data shows Montana at 6.90¢, North Dakota at 8.27¢, New Mexico at 5.65¢, and the U.S. industrial average at 8.95¢/kWh. These are average-revenue benchmarks, not account-specific tariff quotes.

5.97¢
Montana Industrial
At publication; current 6.90¢
7.84¢
North Dakota
At publication; current 8.27¢
7.12¢
New Mexico
At publication; current 5.65¢

State-by-State Industrial Rate Breakdown

StateAt PublicationCurrent EIAPrimary Driver
Montana5.97¢6.90¢Hydro (Hungry Horse, Libby Dam)
New Mexico7.12¢5.65¢Solar + legacy coal baseload
North Dakota7.84¢8.27¢Wind + associated Bakken gas
US National Avg8.88¢8.95¢Blended all sources

Montana: Hydroelectric Advantage Under Pressure

At publication, Montana’s industrial benchmark was 5.97¢/kWh; the current February 2026 EIA benchmark is 6.90¢/kWh. This pricing floor is anchored by federal hydroelectric dams operated by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), which deliver baseload at cost to co-ops and public utility districts.

However, BPA’s decision to join SPP Markets+ (effective 2026) introduces new market clearing dynamics. Industrial customers currently receiving cost-based hydro allocations should monitor SPP integration closely — market-based dispatch could erode Montana’s structural advantage by $0.005–0.008/kWh within 2 years.

Data center siting note: Colstrip’s announced Phase 4 retirement (2027) will remove 740 MW of baseload. Large loads considering Montana should secure interconnection agreements before this capacity exits.

North Dakota: Bakken Gas Keeps Rates Low

At publication, North Dakota’s industrial benchmark was 7.84¢/kWh; the current February 2026 EIA benchmark is 8.27¢/kWh. The state’s industrial cost profile benefits from the Bakken shale formation’s associated gas production. Flare-gas-to-power projects and pipeline proximity mean industrial users in William and McKenzie counties can negotiate block-and-index contracts well below many regional alternatives.

Wind generation now accounts for 35% of North Dakota’s total nameplate capacity, creating negative nodal pricing events during low-demand periods. Industrial users with flexible operations can capture sub-4¢/kWh pricing during spring/fall shoulder months by structuring contracts around these surplus windows.

  • Key risk: MISO Transmission Zone 1 cost allocation. MISO’s $8.8B MTEP 26 plan will socialize transmission costs across all load-serving entities. North Dakota’s share could add 0.3–0.5¢/kWh to industrial delivery charges by 2028.

New Mexico: Solar-Coal Transition Economics

At publication, New Mexico’s industrial benchmark was 7.12¢/kWh; the current February 2026 EIA benchmark is 5.65¢/kWh. The state remains in energy transition. PNM (Public Service Company of New Mexico) is replacing the 847 MW San Juan Generating Station with a portfolio of solar, battery storage, and gas peakers. The transition economics remain favorable for many industrial users because:

  • Solar PPAs in the I-25 corridor are clearing at $18–22/MWh (1.8–2.2¢/kWh) — among the cheapest in the nation.
  • PNM’s 2026 rate case requests only a 2.8% increase for its Large Power service class, well below the national trend.
  • The state’s Renewable Energy Act (REA) mandates 50% renewable energy by 2030, but the mandate cost is primarily allocated to residential and small commercial classes, subsidizing large industrial load.

Industrial Procurement Strategies

  • Montana: Lock bilateral PPAs with BPA or WAPA allocations before SPP Markets+ integration reprices hydro. Target 5-year fixed terms at 5.5–6.5¢/kWh.
  • North Dakota: Structure block-and-index contracts to capture negative nodal pricing during wind surplus events. Real-time co-optimization with on-site battery storage can push effective rates below 5¢/kWh.
  • New Mexico: Negotiate behind-the-meter solar PPAs in the I-25 corridor. At $20/MWh solar + $8/MWh battery, a blended self-generation rate of 3–4¢/kWh is achievable for operations above 10 MW.
  • Demand charges: All three states are tightening coincident peak (CP) penalties. Invest in automated demand response or battery arbitrage to shave peak demand charges, which can add 20–40% to the effective ¢/kWh rate for industrial loads with spiky demand profiles.

Source: EIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.b (Industrial), January 2026 data; BPA Wholesale Rate Schedule; MISO MTEP 26 Draft Plan; PNM 2026 Rate Case Filing.

📬Free Intelligence

Free Energy Market Pulse — Every Tuesday

Join energy professionals getting weekly rate alerts, gas forecasts, and procurement intel.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Data never shared.

Deploying Industrial Load?

Montana, North Dakota, and New Mexico offer industrial power 20–55% below the national average. Model your costs.